First you come to this thread and start accusing us of violating the EULA, then you tell us that our older productive Macs with a Sandy Bridge quad-core i7 are obsolete and we should just accept it.
If I were in that situation I would most certainly continue to run El Capitan.Ĭlick to expand.The way you've been defending Apple is truly odd. It is all a question of the better option for example run El Capitan on a 2008 iMac which is guaranteed to be stable or apply a High Sierra hack and take a risk. Trickery to run current macOS releases such as Sierra and High Sierra on obsolete unsupported Macs is all well and good but there are seldom situations where these hacks are one hundred per cent stable. Apple How Dare They? But think about it the Hardware is seven years old which is far older than some non Apple hardware lasts. So many are in denial that their machines are obsolete. There is particular outrage that 2011 Macs have fallen under the hammer as they remain fine productive machines but they are obsolete and there is no getting away from it. It is inevitable Apple have to draw a line at some stage.
Click to expand.And that is exactly why the Apple approach is better as the Mac user knows precisely what release is compatible with corresponding hardware.